Recently, a homeowner submitted an
architectural request to paint the exterior of his home a beige color and the
shutters a dark brown. The request was denied by the ACH Committee, due to the
fact that the colors too closely resembled those of the house next door. The
Committee responded to the request and asked that the homeowner select
different colors. The homeowner then submitted two tiny color sample squares,
each about as big as a half dollar. The siding color appeared to be a light
blue and the shutter color a dark blue.
The Committee initially felt these
colors were too different from the rest of the community and wanted to remain
more neutral. The homeowner claimed the colors were almost identical to what he
currently had on his house (a grayish blue siding with dark blue/navy
shutters). After much deliberation the Committee approved the second request,
and the paint job was completed a few days later.
Immediately, the complaints and
photos starting to roll in as neighbors questioned whether or not the homeowner
had received the proper approval to paint his house. One of the paint colors
turned out to be a very bright, bluish/purplish, almost fluorescent color…which
looked significantly different than the small sample that had been submitted
and approved. Surely these were not the colors that the Committee had
approved??? Once the Committee went back and compared the samples to the house,
they realized they were indeed the same colors approved…whoops!
The Board and the Committee then
brainstormed to try to figure out what could be done that would be agreeable to
both the homeowner and the Association. If the color remained, it could
potentially reduce property values for all. Not to mention, the Board was
getting complaints left and right. As a result, the Board ultimately decided
that if the homeowner was agreeable, the Association would pay to re-paint the
siding up to $750.
But the issues didn’t stop there.
The Board and Committee then needed to find a vendor who would agree to do the
job for around $750. Since the Association was relatively small (composed of
approx 100 homes), they couldn't afford to repaint the house for much more than
$750. To avoid additional angst, the Board did not want to inform the homeowner
of the ongoing issue until they had located a vendor to complete the job. But,
because the homeowner was not aware of the issue, the vendors could not get
onto the property to get accurate estimates for repainting the home. What a
mess!
If and when your community does adopt a color palette,
incorporate it into your Design Standards. Send these updated standards out to
everyone in the community and post them on your community’s website. That way
no one can say they never received the information, making your job easier and
less stressful for your homeowners, too.
Thanks for share this nice information! Your Sound is really good about "Painting the Community Red". I am intimidated by the excellence of information. There are a bundle of good funds here. I am sure I will visit this position again soon.
ReplyDeleteI think, Atlanta condos and lofts are ideally situated for busy executives that prefer to spend their time working rather than driving to their workplace.
Here is some information about siding atlanta.
As a solution, the Fortis Mini Excavator Trackswas created as an easy-to-use platform which connects equipment owners and operators with affordable tracks for their machines. Combined, the owners of Fortis Tracks have over 150 years of heavy equipment & construction experience….
ReplyDelete