Boards of
Directors and Community Association Managers (CAMs) should be mindful of the
boundaries that their legal counsel faces.
Too often, a request or inquiry creates a conflict, because the
attorney’s first duty is to the corporation, not individual Directors or
managers.
For example,
a Director provides non-Board related services to neighbors in the
community. This could be anything from
CPA work, to drafting architectural plans, to handyman construction. During an executive session, the Board of
Directors is notified of a health-safety issue that impacts the clients of this
particular Director. He asks the
Association’s attorney what he can and should disclose to his clients. This is a conflict of fiduciary duties, and the
Board should form an executive committee to handle the life-safety issue
without the conflicted Director’s involvement.
To compound
the situation, the Association’s attorney can’t advise the Director on handling
the client-homeowner information conflict.
This Director would need to retain his own attorney for such advice, but
that attorney is barred from using the Association’s information regarding the
safety hazard. If the conflicted Director
attempts to pass on this information to his attorney, the attorney is obligated
to destroy it and notify the Association’s attorney of the attempt. Quitting the Board does not release the former
Director from his duty of confidentiality.
If and when
to release this sensitive information is an Association-only privilege: No single Board member may unilaterally
decide to disclose. The Board as a group
will need to consult with the attorney before voting to release any
information. Any Director who releases
information without group approval exposes himself to liability and loses the
protection of the Association’s Directors & Officers insurance coverage.
Board
members and managers should also be aware that any private statements that they make
to the Association’s attorney are subject to disclosure in certain situations, at
the discretion of the attorney, even if it could expose the Director or manager
to personal liability. The protection
of the Association as a corporation comes first. If a lawyer learns that an
officer or agent of the community is engaged in or intends to act in a way that
violates a legal obligation, leading to substantial harm for the Association,
the lawyer is required to take whatever actions are necessary to protect the
Association. A Board member violating
his duty to the association by stirring up dissension in the community, or
instructing vendors to conduct work without formal Board approval – either of
these could trigger the attorney to act.
Related to
this are required lines of communication.
For situations where the Association is being represented by an
attorney, all correspondence must be solely to the Association’s legal
counsel. A vendor in a contract dispute,
a homeowner in collections, or raging Board member must have the attorney’s
consent before reaching out to any Board members directly.
As you can
see, the proper handling of Association information is not easy. After annual elections are held, the Board as
a group should invite its corporate counsel to visit and provide in-depth
discussion on this topic.
No comments:
Post a Comment